Rishi Sunak might be taking PMQs in about 20 minutes’ time.
Right here is the listing of MPs right down to ask a query.
Huw Merriman, the rail minister, advised MPs this morning that the federal government has misplaced extra money because of the influence of rail strikes than it might have value to settle the disputes months in the past, PA Media reviews. PA says:
Merriman advised MPs the row has “ended up costing extra” however insisted the “general influence” on all public sector pay offers should be thought-about.
Ben Bradshaw, a Labour member of the committee, put it to Merriman that “we’re speaking of a price to the federal government of over a billion (kilos) up to now” from the influence of strikes, which have repeatedly decimated providers for a number of months.
He went on to ask: “That might simply be sufficient cash to have solved this dispute months in the past, wouldn’t it?”
Merriman replied: “If you happen to have a look at it in that specific lens, then completely, it’s truly ended up costing greater than would have been the case if it was simply settled in that half.
“However, once more, we’ve got to have a look at the general influence on the general public sector pay offers which are going throughout, and we additionally need to look on the flexibility for the reforms that don’t usually get talked about, however they’re completely very important as a part of the bundle.
“It’s the reforms that may truly pay for these pay offers and likewise make the railway extra environment friendly in the long term as nicely.”
Merriman additionally advised the committee that he was “actually hopeful” there would quickly be a settlement with the RMT rail union to finish its strike, PA reviews.
Rishi Sunak might be taking PMQs in about 20 minutes’ time.
Right here is the listing of MPs right down to ask a query.
The Unite union says its goes to announce additional strike dates for its members who work as ambulance workers.
Its ambulance organising skilled committee (OPC) is assembly later as we speak to set new strike dates and the union says this “may see strike motion all through February and March as the federal government continues to refuse to barter on truthful pay for this present monetary 12 months”.
Unite ambulance workers are happening strike in Wales tomorrow, and in 4 English areas and in Wales on Monday 23 January.
In its report concerning the head of the Worldwide Labour Group saying he doesn’t help the federal government’s anti-strikes invoice, the BBC says that, on the similar assembly in Davos, Marty Walsh, the US labour secretary, indicated that he was not in favour of laws for minimal service ranges both.
Paul Nowak, the TUC common secretary, has welcomed these feedback. He mentioned:
Ministers have rightly been referred to as out for spinning mistruths. It’s time the federal government got here clear concerning the draconian nature of this invoice …
The UK already has a number of the most restrictive commerce union legal guidelines in Europe.
It’s little shock that the ILO and the Biden administration have warned towards these spiteful plans.
Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy chief, has additionally made the identical level. She mentioned:
Grant Shapps has been ludicrously claiming that his sacking nurses invoice has the worldwide seal of approval, however the ILO and the US labour secretary clearly beg to vary.
The enterprise secretary has been hiding behind warped and wilful misunderstandings of the Worldwide Labour Group’s code in his determined makes an attempt to justify this shoddy, unworkable and vindictive piece of laws.
The conventional apply inside authorities is for ministers to argue about coverage in personal however, as soon as a place has been agreed, to stay to the collective line.
However, on the proposed conversion practices ban, the method has been inverted. Yesterday Michelle Donelan, the tradition secretary, used a written assertion to announce that the government will ban conversion practices, together with these affecting trans individuals.
And this morning there’s an enormous image of Kemi Badenoch, the equalities minister (and worldwide commerce secretary), alongside a splash story saying she has appreciable reservations concerning the concept.
In his story Daniel Martin says:
The equalities minister is to put in writing to all Tory MPs to insist that a ban on trans conversion therapy should not criminalise mother and father …
Though the transfer was introduced by Ms Donelan, Mrs Badenoch is the minister answerable for the ban. She is known to be involved that it is going to be “onerous” to make sure that there aren’t any unintended penalties and that “there’s a lot nonetheless to work on”.
The Telegraph understands that she intends to emphasize in her letter that nice care must be taken when writing the invoice, with enter from medical doctors and fogeys in addition to the LGBT+ group.
She is ready to acknowledge that the draft model of the laws might be imperfect, with points round what constitutes conversion remedy, and the way to defend religion leaders, counsellors and fogeys, not absolutely resolved.
A supply near Mrs Badenoch mentioned: “The world of gender identification is way more complicated than sexual orientation. We have now mentioned we is not going to inadvertently criminalise mother and father who’re attempting to help youngsters.”
In line with the Telegraph report, Badenoch isn’t against the laws per se, and she or he simply desires to reassure Tory MPs that the invoice gained’t have unintended penalties. However it additionally says she desires “correct time for scrutiny”, which means she wouldn’t be too upset if the plans need to be watered down.
The Telegraph doesn’t say the way it received its story and it’s conceivable that Badenoch is mortified to seek out her pondering revealed on its entrance web page. However Tory MPs will assume the briefing was authorised and, with Badenoch set to be a number one candidate within the subsequent Tory management contest, being seen as sceptical a couple of coverage like this in all probability gained’t do her long-term ambitions any hurt.
MPs will debate the remaining levels of the retained EU legislation (revocation and reform) invoice this afternoon. That is the laws that may abolish round 4,000 EU guidelines imported into UK legislation after Brexit, except a choice is taken to retain or revise them, following a assessment.
The invoice says this could occur by the top of this 12 months. Nearly all consultants suppose this deadline is unrealistic, however the authorities continues to be refusing requires the December 2023 finish date to be faraway from the invoice. Partly that’s as a result of the invoice additionally permits ministers to increase the deadline, division by division, till the top of 2026 in the event that they wish to. When the invoice goes by way of the Lords, friends could amend the invoice to make 2026 the default deadline, not 2023.
As my colleagues Aletha Adu and Lisa O’Carroll report, Labour desires to amend the invoice to guard employees’ rights.
The determine of 4,000 retained EU legal guidelines is an estimate. As Peter Foster from the Monetary Instances factors out, even the federal government doesn’t know what the precise complete is.
However Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, mentioned the inflation figures simply confirmed how individuals had been worse off underneath the Tories. Releasing figures displaying that the typical family is ready to spend 9% of its disposable earnings on vitality in 2023-24, in contrast with 3% in 2019-20, she mentioned:
Every passing day brings increasingly more proof that persons are feeling worse off underneath the Tories.
That such an enormous proportion of family payments might be spent on vitality as a substitute of the issues households take pleasure in is a mark of Tory failure on vitality safety and financial competence.
This Tory authorities’s dearth of ambition for Britain is appalling. After 13 years of failure, they could solely need our financial system to outlive, however Labour desires it to thrive.
Because the social gathering of sound cash, Labour will make our financial system stronger, and with our inexperienced prosperity plan and mission to make Britain the most effective place to start out and develop a enterprise, we’ll get it rising once more.
“Are you higher off than you had been 4 years in the past?” has been a potent electioneering weapon because the query was asked by Ronald Reagan in 1980. Reeves has now made it part of her repertoire.
The Labour social gathering briefing additionally says the typical family is now spending as a lot of its disposable earnings on vitality as it’s on meals (9%), and greater than it’s spending on transport (8%) or recreation and tradition (6%).
UK inflation fell again barely in December to 10.5% however stays at one of many highest ranges in 40 years as the price of dwelling disaster continues, my colleague Phillip Inman reviews.
In a press release issued in response to the figures, Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor, linked persevering with excessive inflation to the general public sector pay disputes, and argued as we speak’s figures justified the federal government’s refusal to award pay rises at or above inflation. He mentioned:
Excessive inflation is a nightmare for household budgets, destroys enterprise funding and results in strike motion, so nonetheless robust, we have to keep on with our plan to deliver it down.
Whereas any fall in inflation is welcome, we’ve got a plan to go additional and halve inflation this 12 months, cut back debt, and develop the financial system – however it is important that we take the troublesome choices wanted and see the plan by way of.
To assist households within the meantime, we’re offering a median of £3,500 of help for each family over this 12 months and subsequent.
The unions, in fact, argue that double-digit inflation is exactly why they do want a bigger pay rise.
Steve Barclay, the well being secretary, has written an article for the Unbiased to coincide with the most recent nurses’ strike as we speak. In what appears like a change of tone from when he met the well being unions final week (and was extra conciliatory, at least according to some accounts), he says that “unaffordable” pay rises for well being employees would take sources away from sufferers. He says:
The nurses’ strike on Wednesday and the further walkouts for next month announced by the Royal Faculty of Nursing (RCN) on Monday will pile on additional stress at this difficult time. Round 30,000 procedures or outpatient appointments had been postponed because of nurse strikes on 15 and 20 December, so I’m disillusioned that sufferers face disruption once more …
With fewer than three months left of this monetary 12 months, it’s time to look forward, not again. I recognise the price of dwelling pressures on NHS workers and I understand how onerous they work. But when we offer unaffordable pay rises to NHS workers, we’ll take billions of kilos away from the place we’d like it most. Unaffordable pay hikes will imply chopping affected person care and stoking the inflation that might make us all poorer.
Good morning. Nurses are on strike in England today, and 1 February (a fortnight as we speak) is gearing as much as be the biggest strike day yet, with prepare drivers, academics and civil servants all placing, on the identical day the TUC holds a “defend the proper to strike” day of campaigning.
The TUC is mobilising opposition to the federal government’s anti-strikes invoice, and this morning No 10 suffered a set again when the Worldwide Labour Organisation, a UN company, made it clear it was not backing the invoice.
So what, you may suppose. This authorities doesn’t fear an excessive amount of concerning the views of worldwide quangos, notably ones which are comparatively unknown. However in current days ministers have repeatedly defended the invoice by implying it has some type of ILO backing. Grant Shapps, the enterprise secretary, advised the Commons on Monday:
The Worldwide Labour Organisation itself states that minimal service ranges could be a proportionate manner of balancing the proper to strike with the necessity to defend the broader public. That’s what we’re doing. Our personal unions subscribe to and help the ILO, as will we.
Rishi Sunak made the identical level at PMQs final week.
However the BBC interviewed Gilbert Houngbo, director common of the ILO, at Davos, and Houngbo sounded shocked to be taught that his organisation was being cited as quasi-endorsing the federal government’s invoice. He advised the broadcaster:
I’m not conscious of any bilateral dialogue on this matter. We’re very nervous that employees could have to just accept conditions so that they don’t get themselves out of a job. They could have to just accept a state of affairs that’s under par.
Faisal Islam, the BBC’s economics editor, has a great write-up of the story here.
Right here is the agenda for the day.
9.30am: Huw Merriman, the rail minister, provides proof to the Commons transport committee.
9.45am: Andy Cooke, chief inspector of constabulary and hearth and rescue providers, provides proof to the Commons residence affairs committee on policing. At 10.45am Harvi Khatkar, chief superintendent and vp on the Police Superintendents’ Affiliation, and Steve Hartshorn, nationwide chair on the Police Federation of England and Wales, give proof.
10.15am: Gillian Keegan, the schooling secretary, holds a gathering with instructing union leaders.
12pm: Rishi Sunak faces Keir Starmer at PMQs.
After 12.45pm: MPs debate the ultimate states of the retained EU legislation (revocation and reform) invoice.
Afternoon: Steve Barclay, the well being secretary, is on a well being go to.
I’ll attempt to monitor the feedback under the road (BTL) however it’s unattainable to learn all of them. When you’ve got a direct query, do embrace “Andrew” in it someplace and I’m extra more likely to discover it. I do attempt to reply questions, and if they’re of common curiosity I’ll put up the query and reply above the road (ATL), though I can’t promise to do that for everybody.
If you wish to appeal to my consideration shortly, it’s in all probability higher to make use of Twitter. I’m on @AndrewSparrow.
Alternatively, you possibly can e-mail me at email@example.com